Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.7 | 82.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | |
| Android 10 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2020-07-14 | 2020-08-20 |
| 6.53 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches | 5.67 x 2.73 x 0.32 inches |
| 7.37 ounces | 5.04 ounces |
| Green and Greener, Out of the Blue and Two Shades of Black | Just black |
| -- | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 349.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 444 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Snapdragon 720G SM7125 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G SM7150-AA chipset |
| Kryo 465, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.11 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3140mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 5.12 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 4a has a global score of 82.9, which is slightly better than the Xiaomi Poco M2 Pro's 78.7 global score. Both phones in our current comparison work with Android OS (Operating System), but Google Pixel 4a has the newer 11 version while Xiaomi Poco M2 Pro has Android 10 version. The Google Pixel 4a body is a little thinner and incredibly lighter than Xiaomi Poco M2 Pro, even though both of them were released only 1 months apart.
Google Pixel 4a counts with a processor that is just as good as the Xiaomi Poco M2 Pro one, and although the Google Pixel 4a has a higher amount of RAM, they both have a Octa-Core processing unit. Google Pixel 4a has a bit better display than Xiaomi Poco M2 Pro, because although it has a little bit smaller display and a little bit worse 1080 x 2340 resolution, it also counts with a quite greater number of pixels per inch of screen.
Xiaomi Poco M2 Pro features a better storage capacity for apps and games than Google Pixel 4a, because although it has less internal storage capacity, it also counts with a slot for external memory cards that supports up to 512 GB. Xiaomi Poco M2 Pro features a better camera than Google Pixel 4a, because although it has a tinier aperture, and they both have the same (4K) video definition and the same video frame rates, the Xiaomi Poco M2 Pro also counts with a lot more mega pixels back facing camera.
Xiaomi Poco M2 Pro has a superior battery life than Google Pixel 4a, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity against 3140mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.