Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.7 | 87.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | |
| Android 10 | Android 11 |
| 2020-07-14 | 2020-11-19 |
| 6.53 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches | 6.06 x 2.91 x 0.32 inches |
| 7.37 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Green and Greener, Out of the Blue and Two Shades of Black | Clearly white and Just black |
| -- | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 500.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 416 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Snapdragon 720G SM7125 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| Kryo 465, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.11 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3885mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 5.84 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 4a 5G has an overall score of 87.5, which is much better than Xiaomi Poco M2 Pro's 78.7 overall score. Both phones in this comparison review include Android OS (Operating System), but Google Pixel 4a 5G has a more recent 11 version and Xiaomi Poco M2 Pro has Android 10 version, providing the user a lot of extra features. The Google Pixel 4a 5G construction is just a little bit thinner and lighter than the Xiaomi Poco M2 Pro, even when both of them were only released with a couple months difference.
The Google Pixel 4a 5G counts with just a bit better display than Xiaomi Poco M2 Pro, because although it has a little worse resolution of 1080 x 2340 and a bit smaller display, it also counts with a bit better pixels quantity in each inch of screen. Google Pixel 4a 5G features a little faster processor than Xiaomi Poco M2 Pro, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the Google Pixel 4a 5G also has more RAM memory.
Xiaomi Poco M2 Pro counts with a slightly better camera than Google Pixel 4a 5G, because although it has a tinier camera aperture and slower 30 frames per second video frame rates, and they both have the same video definition, the Xiaomi Poco M2 Pro also counts with a back camera with way more mega-pixels.
The Xiaomi Poco M2 Pro has a greater storage capacity for games and applications than Google Pixel 4a 5G, because although it has less internal storage capacity, it also counts with a SD card slot that holds up to 512 GB. The Xiaomi Poco M2 Pro has greater battery performance than Google Pixel 4a 5G, because it has a 29 percent bigger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.