Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.7 | 89 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-07-14 | 2020-10-15 |
| 6.53 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches | 5.70 x 2.77 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.37 ounces | 5.33 ounces |
| Green and Greener, Out of the Blue and Two Shades of Black | Just black and Sorta sage |
| -- | Aluminum and Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 548.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 430 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Snapdragon 720G SM7125 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| Kryo 465, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.11 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4080mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 5 has a global score of 89, which is much better than Xiaomi Poco M2 Pro's score of 78.7. Google Pixel 5's body is incredibly lighter and thinner than Xiaomi Poco M2 Pro, although both were released only 3 months apart. Google Pixel 5 has a bit more powerful processor than Xiaomi Poco M2 Pro, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the Google Pixel 5 also has a higher amount of RAM memory.
The Google Pixel 5 counts with just a bit better display than Xiaomi Poco M2 Pro, because although it has a little lower 1080 x 2340px resolution and a little smaller screen, it also counts with a little bit higher pixels count per inch of screen. Xiaomi Poco M2 Pro has a slightly better camera than Google Pixel 5, because although it has a tinier aperture and lower 30 frames per second video frame rate, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, the Xiaomi Poco M2 Pro also counts with a much better resolution back camera.
The Xiaomi Poco M2 Pro features a better memory for applications, games, photos and videos than Google Pixel 5, because although it has 0 less internal storage, it also counts with a slot for SD memory cards that admits up to 512 GB. Xiaomi Poco M2 Pro has longer battery life than Google Pixel 5, because it has a 23 percent bigger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.