Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.7 | 77.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | HTC |
| Android 10 | Android 5.0 |
| 2020-07-14 | 2015-03-01 |
| 6.53 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches | 5.69 x 2.74 x 0.38 inches |
| 7.37 ounces | 5.54 ounces |
| Green and Greener, Out of the Blue and Two Shades of Black | Black, Gold, Gray and Pink |
| -- | Aluminium |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 178.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) |
| IPS LCD | S-LCD 3 |
| 393 pixels per inch | 441 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8 | 9.3 |
| Performance | |
| Snapdragon 720G SM7125 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset |
| Kryo 465, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | 64-bit ARM Cortex-A57 (Quad-Core 2000 MHz + Quad-Core 1500 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Adreno 430 (600 MHz) GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.99 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 8.12 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 20.00 MP + 4.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| -- | 27.80mm focal length |
| -- | 0.42 inches (1/2.4") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.11 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 2840mAh Li-Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | 391 hours standby time 25.4 hours talk time |
| 6.8 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Infra-red port | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Poco M2 Pro has a general score of 78.7, which is a little bit better than HTC One M9's 77.7 global score. Both of these phones use Android OS, but the Xiaomi Poco M2 Pro has a more recent 10 version while HTC One M9 has Android 5.0 version. Xiaomi Poco M2 Pro's body is a lot newer and just a little thinner than HTC One M9's, although it's also way heavier.
HTC One M9 has a more vivid screen than Xiaomi Poco M2 Pro, because although it has a bit worse resolution of 1920 x 1080px and a really smaller screen, it also counts with a bit higher pixels number in each screen inch. Xiaomi Poco M2 Pro counts with much more memory capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than HTC One M9, because it has more internal memory capacity and a slot for SD memory cards that supports up to 512 GB.
The HTC One M9 features a bit superior processor than Xiaomi Poco M2 Pro, because although it has a smaller amount of RAM, and they both have the same number of cores, the HTC One M9 also counts with a 64 bits processor and an additional graphics co-processor. Xiaomi Poco M2 Pro counts with a little bit better camera than HTC One M9, and although they both have the same video frame rate and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, the Xiaomi Poco M2 Pro also has a camera with a lot better 48 mega pixels resolution and a larger aperture for better low-light captures and videos.
The Xiaomi Poco M2 Pro has a much better battery lifetime than HTC One M9, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.