Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.7 | 77 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | HTC |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-07-14 | 2017-02-21 |
| 6.53 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches | 6.39 x 3.14 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.37 ounces | 6.00 ounces |
| Green and Greener, Out of the Blue and Two Shades of Black | 16 777 216 |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 749.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | S-LCD 5 |
| 393 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Snapdragon 720G SM7125 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro-AB chipset |
| Kryo 465, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.27 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.11 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Poco M2 Pro has a global score of 78.7, which is just a bit better than the HTC U Ultra's 77 overall score. The Xiaomi Poco M2 Pro is a much newer cellphone than the HTC U Ultra, although it is thicker and somewhat heavier. The Xiaomi Poco M2 Pro has just a little better performance than HTC U Ultra, and although they both have the same RAM amount, the Xiaomi Poco M2 Pro also has a higher number of cores.
HTC U Ultra features a little sharper screen than Xiaomi Poco M2 Pro, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a better pixels amount in each inch in the screen and a higher resolution of 1440 x 2560px. The HTC U Ultra features a much bigger memory capacity to store more games and applications than Xiaomi Poco M2 Pro, and although they both have the same 64 GB internal memory, the HTC U Ultra also has an external memory card slot that holds a maximum of 1,95 TB.
Xiaomi Poco M2 Pro features a much longer battery life than HTC U Ultra, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity instead of 3000mAh. Xiaomi Poco M2 Pro has a much better camera than HTC U Ultra, and although they both have the same 30 frames per second video frame rates, the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution and a F1.8 camera aperture, the Xiaomi Poco M2 Pro also has a much better resolution back-facing camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.