Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.7 | 87.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Motorola |
| Android 10 | Android 14 |
| 2020-07-14 | 2024-04-16 |
| 6.53 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches | 6.34 x 2.85 x 0.34 inches |
| 7.37 ounces | 6.95 ounces |
| Green and Greener, Out of the Blue and Two Shades of Black | Forest Grey (Vegan Leather), Nordic Wood and Peach Fuzz (Vegan Leather) |
| -- | Aluminum, Vegan Leather and Wood |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | P-OLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 2500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 9.6 |
| Performance | |
| Snapdragon 720G SM7125 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 465, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Adreno 720 GPU |
| 9.27 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| -- | 25.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.11 | 12.32 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.4 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has a score of 87.1, which is better than the Xiaomi Poco M2 Pro's overall score of 78.7. Both devices in our current comparison use Android OS (Operating System), but the Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has a more recent 14 version while Xiaomi Poco M2 Pro has Android 10, providing the user lots of additional features and a performance increase. Motorola Edge 50 Ultra's body is extremely newer, a bit thinner and just a little bit lighter than the Xiaomi Poco M2 Pro.
Xiaomi Poco M2 Pro has a much faster processing unit than Motorola Edge 50 Ultra, although it has 8 GB less RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core CPU. Motorola Edge 50 Ultra counts with a lot better looking display than Xiaomi Poco M2 Pro. Both of them have the same pixels density, the same 1080 x 2400 resolution and a screen with the same size.
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra features a lot bigger memory for games and applications than Xiaomi Poco M2 Pro, because although it has no SD memory card expansion slot, it also counts with more internal storage. Xiaomi Poco M2 Pro counts with a little longer battery lifetime than Motorola Edge 50 Ultra, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity against 4500mAh.
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra shoots much better pictures and videos than Xiaomi Poco M2 Pro, and although they both have the same (4K) video definition, the Motorola Edge 50 Ultra also has a larger diafragm aperture to take better low light captures, a back-facing camera with more megapixels and faster 60 frames per second video frame rate.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.