Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.7 | 85.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2020-07-14 | 2019-12-27 |
| 6.53 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches | 6.24 x 2.90 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.37 ounces | 6.07 ounces |
| Green and Greener, Out of the Blue and Two Shades of Black | Prism Crush black, Prism Crush blue, Prism Crush pink and Prism Crush white |
| -- | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 282.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Snapdragon 720G SM7125 chipset | Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset |
| Kryo 465, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.11 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy A51 is slightly better than the Xiaomi Poco M2 Pro, having a global score of 85.5 against 78.7. Both of these phones use Android OS, but Galaxy A51 has newer 11 version and Xiaomi Poco M2 Pro has Android 10, so it provides you a couple nice extra features. The Galaxy A51 is a thinner and somewhat lighter device than the Xiaomi Poco M2 Pro, although they were released only a few months apart.
The Samsung Galaxy A51 features a little bit better screen than Xiaomi Poco M2 Pro, because although it has a little smaller screen, and they both have the same exact resolution of 1080 x 2400, the Samsung Galaxy A51 also counts with a just a bit better display density. The Galaxy A51 has a processor that's just as good as Xiaomi Poco M2 Pro's CPU, both have the same number of cores and the same RAM amount.
The Samsung Galaxy A51 features a lot bigger storage capacity to store more apps and games than Xiaomi Poco M2 Pro, and although they both have a SD extension slot that admits a maximum of 512 GB, the Samsung Galaxy A51 also has more internal storage. The Xiaomi Poco M2 Pro features longer battery performance than Samsung Galaxy A51, because it has a 25% more battery capacity.
Galaxy A51 captures a little bit better photographs and videos than Xiaomi Poco M2 Pro, although it has a tinier aperture which is not favorable for low light images and video, they both have the same resolution back facing camera, the same 3840x2160 video quality and the same video frame rate.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.