Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.7 | 91.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 12, 11 |
| 2020-07-14 | 2021-03-19 |
| 6.53 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches | 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.37 ounces | 6.67 ounces |
| Green and Greener, Out of the Blue and Two Shades of Black | -- |
| -- | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Snapdragon 720G SM7125 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 (8 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 465, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.11 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A52 5G is much better than the Xiaomi Poco M2 Pro, with a overall score of 91.3 against 78.7. Samsung Galaxy A52 5G's construction is just a bit thinner and a little lighter than the Xiaomi Poco M2 Pro, although they were released only a couple months apart. Both of these phones work with Android operating system, but the Samsung Galaxy A52 5G has a more recent 12 version while Xiaomi Poco M2 Pro has Android 10 version, giving some extra features and increased performance.
The Galaxy A52 5G has a little more vivid screen than Xiaomi Poco M2 Pro, because although it has a bit smaller screen, and they both have an equal 1080 x 2400 resolution, the Galaxy A52 5G also counts with a quite greater pixels density. Galaxy A52 5G's processor is just as good as the CPU in Xiaomi Poco M2 Pro, and although the Galaxy A52 5G has 2 GB more RAM, they both have the same number of cores.
Galaxy A52 5G has a very superior storage to store more games and applications than Xiaomi Poco M2 Pro, because it has 128 GB internal storage and a SD memory slot that holds a maximum of 1 TB. Xiaomi Poco M2 Pro has just a little better battery duration than Galaxy A52 5G, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity instead of 4500mAh.
The Galaxy A52 5G captures slightly better photos and videos than Xiaomi Poco M2 Pro, and although they both have a F1.8 camera aperture, the same 3840x2160 video quality and the same 30 frames per second video frame rate, the Galaxy A52 5G also has a back-facing camera with a much better resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.