Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.7 | 88.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 11 |
| 2020-07-14 | 2021-02-22 |
| 6.53 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches | 6.45 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches |
| 7.37 ounces | 7.69 ounces |
| Green and Greener, Out of the Blue and Two Shades of Black | Laser Blue, Laser Green and Laser Grey |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 393 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 420 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Snapdragon 720G SM7125 chipset | Exynos 9825 chipset |
| Kryo 465, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Cortex-A55, 7 nm (Quad-Core 2730 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | ARM Mali-G76 MP12 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.11 | 11.99 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 7000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 8.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy F62 is better than the Xiaomi Poco M2 Pro, with a overall score of 88.1 against 78.7. Both phones in this comparison have Android OS (operating system), but Galaxy F62 has a newer 11 version while Xiaomi Poco M2 Pro has Android 10 version, so it counts with some extra features. Despite being the best in this comparison, Galaxy F62's construction is a bit heavier and a little bit thicker than the Xiaomi Poco M2 Pro.
Samsung Galaxy F62 counts with a CPU that's very similar to the processing unit in Xiaomi Poco M2 Pro, because although the Samsung Galaxy F62 has a lower number of cores , it also counts with more RAM. The Galaxy F62 counts with a bit more vivid display than Xiaomi Poco M2 Pro. Both have a greater pixels amount per display inch, the same exact 1080 x 2400 resolution and a same size display.
The Samsung Galaxy F62 shoots just a bit better pictures and videos than Xiaomi Poco M2 Pro, and although they both have the same diafragm aperture, the same (4K) video resolution and the same video frame rates, the Samsung Galaxy F62 also has a lot higher resolution back facing camera. Galaxy F62 features a lot bigger memory to store more games and applications than Xiaomi Poco M2 Pro, because it has 128 GB internal memory and a slot for external memory cards that admits up to 1 TB.
Samsung Galaxy F62 features a superior battery performance than Xiaomi Poco M2 Pro, because it has 7000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.