Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.7 | 98.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 13, 12, 11, 10 |
| 2020-07-14 | 2020-08-21 |
| 6.53 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches | 6.49 x 3.04 x 0.32 inches |
| 7.37 ounces | 7.34 ounces |
| Green and Greener, Out of the Blue and Two Shades of Black | Mystic black, Mystic bronze and Mystic white |
| -- | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) and Stainless steel |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1300.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.9 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 3088 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 494 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Snapdragon 720G SM7125 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 465, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.11 | 13.64 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra is a lot better than Xiaomi Poco M2 Pro, having a general score of 98.9 against 78.7. Both of these devices include Android OS, but Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has a more recent 13 version while Xiaomi Poco M2 Pro has Android 10, counting with a lot of extra features and performance enhancements. The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra construction is a little lighter and a little thinner than the Xiaomi Poco M2 Pro, although both of them were released with only a couple of months difference.
The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra counts with a slightly better looking display than Xiaomi Poco M2 Pro, because it has a little larger screen, a higher pixel amount in each inch of screen and a higher 1440 x 3088px resolution. Galaxy Note 20 Ultra features a lot bigger memory for games and applications than Xiaomi Poco M2 Pro, because it has a slot for external memory cards that supports up to 1000 GB and 128 GB internal memory capacity.
The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has a bit better CPU than Xiaomi Poco M2 Pro, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra also has a greater amount of RAM memory. The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra shoots a lot better photos and videos than Xiaomi Poco M2 Pro, and although they both have the same aperture, the Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra also has a lot better video definition and a much more megapixels back camera.
The Xiaomi Poco M2 Pro has a little better battery life than Galaxy Note 20 Ultra, because it has an 11 percent more battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.