Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.7 | 80.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-07-14 | 2017-07-07 |
| 6.53 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches | 6.04 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.37 ounces | 5.89 ounces |
| Green and Greener, Out of the Blue and Two Shades of Black | Black, Blue, Gold and Silver |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 611.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Snapdragon 720G SM7125 chipset | Samsung Exynos 8 Octa 8890 chipset |
| Kryo 465, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Exynos M1and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Mali-T880 MP12 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.11 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3200mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition is a bit better than Xiaomi Poco M2 Pro, getting a overall score of 80.4 against 78.7. Even though the Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition is a lot older than the Xiaomi Poco M2 Pro, it's design is extremely lighter and somewhat thinner. The Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition features a little more vivid screen than Xiaomi Poco M2 Pro, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a higher resolution of 1440 x 2560px and a greater pixel amount per inch of display.
The Xiaomi Poco M2 Pro features a bit bigger storage for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition, and although they both have exactly the same internal storage capacity, the Xiaomi Poco M2 Pro also has an external memory slot that allows a maximum of 512 GB. Xiaomi Poco M2 Pro and Galaxy Note Fan Edition have similar processing units, they have a 4 GB RAM and the same number of cores.
The Xiaomi Poco M2 Pro takes much better photographs and videos than Galaxy Note Fan Edition, because although it has a tinier camera aperture which is not nice for capturing images and videos in low light environments, and they both have the same video quality and the same 30 frames per second video frame rate, the Xiaomi Poco M2 Pro also counts with a lot more mega-pixels back camera.
Xiaomi Poco M2 Pro has a superior battery performance than Galaxy Note Fan Edition, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity instead of 3200mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.