Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.7 | 95.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 13, 12 |
| 2020-07-14 | 2022-02-25 |
| 6.53 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches | 6.43 x 3.07 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.37 ounces | 8.08 ounces |
| Green and Greener, Out of the Blue and Two Shades of Black | Burgundy, Green, Phantom Black and White |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1200.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 3088 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 501 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1750 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 9.9 |
| Performance | |
| Snapdragon 720G SM7125 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 SM8450 (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 465, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Quad-Core 2800 MHz + Quad-Core 1800 MHz processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Adreno 730 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 23.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.11 | 13.75 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S22 Ultra has a general score of 95.4, which is much better than Xiaomi Poco M2 Pro's global score of 78.7. The Galaxy S22 Ultra body has the same thickness than Xiaomi Poco M2 Pro, but it is a bit heavier. These phones include Android OS (Operating System), but the Galaxy S22 Ultra has the newer 13 version and Xiaomi Poco M2 Pro has Android 10 version, so it counts with some extra features.
The Galaxy S22 Ultra has a way better screen than Xiaomi Poco M2 Pro, because it has a higher 1440 x 3088 resolution, a better quantity of pixels per inch of display and a little bigger screen. The Xiaomi Poco M2 Pro counts with more memory capacity for games and applications than Galaxy S22 Ultra, because although it has just 64 GB internal memory, it also counts with a slot for external memory cards that supports a maximum of 512 GB.
The Galaxy S22 Ultra counts with a little bit better performance than Xiaomi Poco M2 Pro, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy S22 Ultra also has a greater amount of RAM memory. Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra captures much clearer videos and photos than Xiaomi Poco M2 Pro, and although they both have the same camera aperture, the Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra also has a lot better 7680x4320 video resolution and a much better 108 mega pixels resolution back-facing camera.
Galaxy S22 Ultra's battery lifetime is very similar to the Xiaomi Poco M2 Pro one.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.