Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.7 | 82.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 14 |
| 2020-07-14 | -- |
| 6.53 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches | -- |
| 7.37 ounces | -- |
| Green and Greener, Out of the Blue and Two Shades of Black | -- |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus 2) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 800.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 416 pixels per inch |
| -- | 2600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| Snapdragon 720G SM7125 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 chipset |
| Kryo 465, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Yes GPU |
| 9.27 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 24.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.11 | 12.54 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S25 has a global score of 82.6, which is slightly better than the Xiaomi Poco M2 Pro's global score of 78.7. Both of these phones include Android OS (operating system), but the Galaxy S25 has a more recent 14 version while Xiaomi Poco M2 Pro has Android 10 version, providing the user a couple additional features and performance optimizations. The Galaxy S25 body is thinner and much lighter than Xiaomi Poco M2 Pro.
The Samsung Galaxy S25 has a lot better looking display than Xiaomi Poco M2 Pro, because although it has a quite lower 1080 x 2340 resolution and a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a little better display pixel density. Xiaomi Poco M2 Pro features a greater storage for applications, games, photos and videos than Galaxy S25, because although it has just 64 GB internal storage capacity, it also counts with a slot for an external memory card that admits a maximum of 512 GB.
Xiaomi Poco M2 Pro features a lot better hardware performance than Galaxy S25, although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores. The Galaxy S25 shoots much better photographs and videos than Xiaomi Poco M2 Pro, and although they both have a F1.8 aperture, the Galaxy S25 also has a back facing camera with more mega pixels and a way higher 7680x4320 video resolution.
Xiaomi Poco M2 Pro has improved battery life than Samsung Galaxy S25, because it has a 25% greater battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.