Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.7 | 90.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 14 |
| 2020-07-14 | -- |
| 6.53 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches | -- |
| 7.37 ounces | -- |
| Green and Greener, Out of the Blue and Two Shades of Black | -- |
| -- | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Titanium |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 3088 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 501 pixels per inch |
| -- | 2600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 10.2 |
| Performance | |
| Snapdragon 720G SM7125 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 chipset |
| Kryo 465, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Yes GPU |
| 9.27 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 200.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 24.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.11 | 14.74 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 5000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S25 Ultra has a score of 90.7, which is better than the Xiaomi Poco M2 Pro's score of 78.7. The Galaxy S25 Ultra body is incredibly thinner and a lot lighter than Xiaomi Poco M2 Pro. These phones include Android operating system, but Galaxy S25 Ultra has a more recent 14 version and Xiaomi Poco M2 Pro has Android 10.
The Xiaomi Poco M2 Pro features a much powerful processing unit than Galaxy S25 Ultra, although it has a lower amount of RAM memory, they both have 8 CPU cores. Galaxy S25 Ultra counts with a way better looking screen than Xiaomi Poco M2 Pro, because it has a little bit bigger screen, a better 1440 x 3088px resolution and a better pixels density.
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra shoots a lot better videos and photos than Xiaomi Poco M2 Pro, because it has a way higher resolution camera, a larger camera aperture and a lot better video resolution. Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra counts with a greater memory capacity to install games and applications than Xiaomi Poco M2 Pro, because although it has no external SD slot, it also counts with more internal storage capacity.
Galaxy S25 Ultra's battery lifetime is very similar to the battery life in Xiaomi Poco M2 Pro.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.