Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.7 | 80.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 5.0 |
| 2020-07-14 | -- |
| 6.53 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches | 5.78 x 2.90 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.37 ounces | -- |
| Green and Greener, Out of the Blue and Two Shades of Black | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 245.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 576 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8 | 9.9 |
| Performance | |
| Snapdragon 720G SM7125 chipset | Exynos 7 Octa 7420 chipset |
| Kryo 465, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | 64-bit ARM Cortex-A57 (Quad-Core 2100 MHz + Quad-Core 1500 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 3 GB (1600 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Mali-T760 MP8 (650 MHz) GPU |
| 9.27 | 10.08 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSD external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 5.8 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| -- | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.11 | 8.47 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Infra-red port | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy S6 Active is slightly better than Xiaomi Poco M2 Pro, getting a score of 80.9 against 78.7. Both of these phones come with Android OS (Operating System), but the Galaxy S6 Active has the previous 5.0 version while Xiaomi Poco M2 Pro has Android 10 version. Galaxy S6 Active counts with a much sharper display than Xiaomi Poco M2 Pro, because although it has a lot smaller screen, it also counts with a better pixels density and a better resolution of 2560 x 1440.
The Galaxy S6 Active features just a little better processing power than Xiaomi Poco M2 Pro, because although it has 1 GB lesser RAM, and they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Galaxy S6 Active also counts with a graphics processing unit and a 64-bit CPU. Xiaomi Poco M2 Pro counts with much more storage to install games and applications than Galaxy S6 Active, because it has 64 GB internal storage.
The Xiaomi Poco M2 Pro shoots much clearer photographs and videos than Samsung Galaxy S6 Active, and although they both have the same video frame rates and the same (4K) video quality, the Xiaomi Poco M2 Pro also has a larger aperture and a way more MP camera in the back. The Xiaomi Poco M2 Pro features a way better battery duration than Samsung Galaxy S6 Active, because it has a 5000mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.