Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.7 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-07-14 | 2016-06-10 |
| 6.53 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches | 5.86 x 2.95 x 0.39 inches |
| 7.37 ounces | 6.53 ounces |
| Green and Greener, Out of the Blue and Two Shades of Black | Camo green, Sandy gold and Titanium gray |
| -- | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 247.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 576 pixels per inch |
| -- | 500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 9.3 |
| Performance | |
| Snapdragon 720G SM7125 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| Kryo 465, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.27 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 8.56 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.11 | 9.46 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | HSPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 3 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Poco M2 Pro has an overall score of 78.7, which is slightly better than the Samsung Galaxy S7 Active's 75.8 global score. Xiaomi Poco M2 Pro is a notably newer and somewhat thinner cellphone than Samsung Galaxy S7 Active, although it is somewhat heavier. The Samsung Galaxy S7 Active counts with a better looking display than Xiaomi Poco M2 Pro, because although it has a much smaller display, it also counts with more pixels per screen inch and a higher resolution of 1440 x 2560px.
Xiaomi Poco M2 Pro has a little bit better performance than Samsung Galaxy S7 Active, and although they both have a 4 GB RAM memory, the Xiaomi Poco M2 Pro also has a larger number of cores. Xiaomi Poco M2 Pro features a much better camera than Samsung Galaxy S7 Active, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not favorable for taking pictures or videos in poorly lited situations, and they both have the same 30 fps video frame rate and the same video quality, the Xiaomi Poco M2 Pro also counts with a back-facing camera with a lot higher 48 megapixels resolution.
Xiaomi Poco M2 Pro has a way bigger storage for applications and games than Samsung Galaxy S7 Active, because it has 64 GB internal storage and a slot for an SD memory card that admits a maximum of 512 GB. The Xiaomi Poco M2 Pro has better battery lifetime than Galaxy S7 Active, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.