Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.7 | 81.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-07-14 | 2017-08-11 |
| 6.53 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches | 5.99 x 2.95 x 0.39 inches |
| 7.37 ounces | 7.34 ounces |
| Green and Greener, Out of the Blue and Two Shades of Black | Gold and Gray |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 245.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2960 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 568 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Snapdragon 720G SM7125 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Kryo 465, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.11 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S8 Active is a little bit better than Xiaomi Poco M2 Pro, with a overall score of 81.9 against 78.7. The Samsung Galaxy S8 Active body is just a bit lighter than the Xiaomi Poco M2 Pro, but it's somewhat thicker and was released 3 years before. The Galaxy S8 Active counts with a more vivid screen than Xiaomi Poco M2 Pro, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a higher pixels density and a better 1440 x 2960 resolution.
Xiaomi Poco M2 Pro has just a bit more memory capacity for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy S8 Active, and although they both have the same 64 GB internal memory, the Xiaomi Poco M2 Pro also has a slot for an external memory card that supports up to 512 GB. Samsung Galaxy S8 Active's processor is just as good as the processor in Xiaomi Poco M2 Pro, they have 8 cpu cores and a 4 GB RAM.
Xiaomi Poco M2 Pro has superior battery duration than Samsung Galaxy S8 Active, because it has a 25 percent greater battery capacity. Xiaomi Poco M2 Pro captures much clearer videos and photos than Samsung Galaxy S8 Active, because although it has a smaller aperture, and they both have the same 30 frames per second video frame rates and the same 3840x2160 video definition, the Xiaomi Poco M2 Pro also counts with a much better 48 MP resolution back facing camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.