Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.7 | 83.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-07-14 | 2018-03-16 |
| 6.53 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches | 5.81 x 2.70 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.37 ounces | 5.75 ounces |
| Green and Greener, Out of the Blue and Two Shades of Black | Burgundy red, Coral blue, Ice blue, Lilac purple, Midnight black, Sunrise gold and Titanium gray |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 158.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2960 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 568 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Snapdragon 720G SM7125 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo 465, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 11.34 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.11 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S9 is slightly better than the Xiaomi Poco M2 Pro, getting a general score of 83.3 against 78.7. Samsung Galaxy S9 is an a lot older cellphone than Xiaomi Poco M2 Pro, but Samsung was able to build it a little bit thinner and incredibly lighter anyway. Galaxy S9 has a much better looking screen than Xiaomi Poco M2 Pro, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a higher resolution of 1440 x 2960px and more pixels per inch of display.
The Samsung Galaxy S9 features a little bit better hardware performance than Xiaomi Poco M2 Pro. Both of them have a Octa-Core processor and 4 GB of RAM memory. Xiaomi Poco M2 Pro features a little bit better memory capacity for applications and games than Samsung Galaxy S9, and although they both have exactly the same internal memory, the Xiaomi Poco M2 Pro also has a slot for an SD memory card that holds a maximum of 512 GB.
Xiaomi Poco M2 Pro counts with a much better battery life than Galaxy S9, because it has a 5000mAh battery size instead of 3000mAh. The Xiaomi Poco M2 Pro takes just a bit better photographs and videos than Galaxy S9, because although it has a smaller camera aperture which is not nice for low light images and video and slower video frame rates, and they both have the same (4K) video quality, the Xiaomi Poco M2 Pro also counts with a back facing camera with way more megapixels.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.