Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.7 | 80.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 8.0 Oreo |
| 2020-07-14 | 2020-04-04 |
| 6.53 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches | 6.24 x 3.18 x 0.56 inches |
| 7.37 ounces | 9.03 ounces |
| Green and Greener, Out of the Blue and Two Shades of Black | Black |
| -- | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 1105.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | -- |
| 393 pixels per inch | 576 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Snapdragon 720G SM7125 chipset | Samsung Exynos 9810 chipset |
| Kryo 465, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Exynos M3 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Mali-G72 MP18 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.11 | 8.14 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro has an overall score of 80.1, which is just a bit better than the Xiaomi Poco M2 Pro's score of 78.7. Despite being the best phone in our current comparison, Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro's design is somewhat heavier and thicker than Xiaomi Poco M2 Pro. Both phones we compare here work with Android OS (Operating System), but Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro has a newer 8.0 Oreo version while Xiaomi Poco M2 Pro has Android 10, so it provides the user lots of additional features.
The Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro features just a little better hardware performance than Xiaomi Poco M2 Pro. Both have a 4 GB RAM memory and 8 processing cores. The Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro counts with a more vivid display than Xiaomi Poco M2 Pro, because although it has a much smaller display, it also counts with a higher resolution of 1440 x 2560 and a greater number of pixels per inch in the display.
The Xiaomi Poco M2 Pro captures way better photographs and videos than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture which is not so good for low-light photography and video, it also counts with a lot more mega-pixels camera and a lot better 3840x2160 video definition.
The Galaxy XCover FieldPro's storage for apps and games is very similar to Xiaomi Poco M2 Pro's one, both of them have a slot for an external memory card that allows up to 512 GB and exactly the same 64 GB internal storage. Xiaomi Poco M2 Pro has just a bit longer battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because it has an 11% more battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.