Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.7 | 88.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 12, 11, 10 |
| 2020-07-14 | 2020-02-14 |
| 6.53 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches | 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches |
| 7.37 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Green and Greener, Out of the Blue and Two Shades of Black | Mirror black and Mirror purple |
| -- | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 1380.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2636 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 425 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Snapdragon 720G SM7125 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 465, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.11 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Z Flip has a global score of 88.5, which is much better than Xiaomi Poco M2 Pro's overall score of 78.7. Both of these phones use Android OS (Operating System), but Galaxy Z Flip has 12 version while Xiaomi Poco M2 Pro has Android 10 version, offering a couple nice extra features and optimized performance. Galaxy Z Flip is a lighter and thinner device than Xiaomi Poco M2 Pro, although both were released with only a couple of months difference.
Galaxy Z Flip counts with a slightly better looking display than Xiaomi Poco M2 Pro, and although they both have a same size display, the Galaxy Z Flip also has a slightly higher 1080 x 2636 resolution and a just a bit greater display density. The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip features a bit more powerful processor than Xiaomi Poco M2 Pro, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip also has a larger amount of RAM memory.
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip counts with more storage capacity for games and applications than Xiaomi Poco M2 Pro, because although it has no external memory slot, it also counts with 256 GB internal memory capacity. Xiaomi Poco M2 Pro counts with a way better battery duration than Galaxy Z Flip, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity against 3300mAh.
Xiaomi Poco M2 Pro takes a bit better photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip, because although it has lower video frame rate, and they both have a same size camera aperture and the same video resolution, the Xiaomi Poco M2 Pro also counts with a back-facing camera with lot more mega pixels.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.