Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.7 | 92.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2020-07-14 | 2020-08-07 |
| 6.53 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches | 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches |
| 7.37 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Green and Greener, Out of the Blue and Two Shades of Black | Mystic bronze, Mystic gray and Mystic white |
| -- | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 603.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2636 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 425 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Snapdragon 720G SM7125 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset |
| Kryo 465, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.11 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G is better than Xiaomi Poco M2 Pro, having a overall score of 92.3 against 78.7. These phones work with Android OS (operating system), but the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G has the newer 11 version while Xiaomi Poco M2 Pro has Android 10 version, so it gives lots of additional features. The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G is a thinner and somewhat lighter device than the Xiaomi Poco M2 Pro, even when they were only released with a few months difference.
The Galaxy Z Flip 5G has just a bit better processing power than Xiaomi Poco M2 Pro, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy Z Flip 5G also has a higher amount of RAM. Galaxy Z Flip 5G counts with just a bit better looking display than Xiaomi Poco M2 Pro, and although they both have a display of the same size, the Galaxy Z Flip 5G also has a bit higher resolution of 1080 x 2636px and a just a bit better pixel amount in each inch of display.
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G has more storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Xiaomi Poco M2 Pro, because although it has no external memory slot, it also counts with 256 GB internal memory. The Xiaomi Poco M2 Pro has a superior battery lifetime than Galaxy Z Flip 5G, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
The Xiaomi Poco M2 Pro has a slightly better camera than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G, because although it has worse video frame rate, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video definition and a same size aperture, the Xiaomi Poco M2 Pro also counts with a back camera with a lot higher resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.