Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.7 | 94.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2020-07-14 | 2020-09-18 |
| 6.53 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches | 6.27 x 5.05 x 0.27 inches |
| 7.37 ounces | 9.95 ounces |
| Green and Greener, Out of the Blue and Two Shades of Black | Mystic black and Mystic bronze |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 1930.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 7.6 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2208 x 1768 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 372 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Snapdragon 720G SM7125 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset |
| Kryo 465, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.11 | 10.45 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Z Fold 2 is way better than the Xiaomi Poco M2 Pro, getting a score of 94.6 against 78.7. Both devices we compare here come with Android OS (operating system), but Galaxy Z Fold 2 has the newer 11 version and Xiaomi Poco M2 Pro has Android 10 version, providing you lots of additional features. Galaxy Z Fold 2's body is notably thinner but notably heavier than the Xiaomi Poco M2 Pro, and they were only released with a few months difference.
The Galaxy Z Fold 2 counts with a bit better looking display than Xiaomi Poco M2 Pro, because although it has a little less pixels per inch in the screen, it also counts with a bit larger display and a higher 1768 x 2208 pixels resolution. Galaxy Z Fold 2 has just a little better processing power than Xiaomi Poco M2 Pro, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy Z Fold 2 also has a greater amount of RAM.
Xiaomi Poco M2 Pro shoots just a bit better videos and photos than Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2, because although it has lower video frame rates, and they both have the same (4K) video resolution and the same aperture, the Xiaomi Poco M2 Pro also counts with a way more mega pixels back-facing camera. Galaxy Z Fold 2 counts with a better storage capacity for apps and games than Xiaomi Poco M2 Pro, because although it has no slot for external memory cards, it also counts with 256 GB internal memory.
The Xiaomi Poco M2 Pro counts with just a little bit longer battery lifetime than Galaxy Z Fold 2, because it has an 11 percent greater battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.