Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.8 | 88.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 11 |
| 2021-05-20 | 2021-02-22 |
| 6.37 x 2.97 x 0.35 inches | 6.45 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches |
| 6.70 ounces | 7.69 ounces |
| Cool Blue, POCO Yellow and Power Black | Laser Blue, Laser Green and Laser Grey |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 405 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 420 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 700 MT6833V chipset | Exynos 9825 chipset |
| Cortex-A76, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Cortex-A55, 7 nm (Quad-Core 2730 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC2 GPU | ARM Mali-G76 MP12 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.89 | 11.99 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 7000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 8.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy F62 is just a bit better than the Xiaomi POCO M3 Pro 5G, getting an 88.1 score against 80.8. The Galaxy F62 design is just a little thicker and somewhat heavier than Xiaomi POCO M3 Pro 5G. Both phones we are comparing here include the same Android 11 OS. Galaxy F62 has a bit sharper display than Xiaomi POCO M3 Pro 5G, because although it has a quite worse pixel density, and they both have the same exact 1080 x 2400 resolution, the Galaxy F62 also counts with a bit bigger screen.
The Galaxy F62 has a lot bigger storage capacity to install applications and games than Xiaomi POCO M3 Pro 5G, because it has 128 GB internal memory capacity and a SD card slot that holds a maximum of 1 TB. Galaxy F62 has just a little better performance than Xiaomi POCO M3 Pro 5G, because although it has a lower number of cores , it also counts with 2 GB more RAM memory.
Samsung Galaxy F62 has a better camera than Xiaomi POCO M3 Pro 5G, and although they both have the same aperture, the Samsung Galaxy F62 also has a way better resolution back camera, a much better video resolution and a larger camera sensor providing a higher image quality. The Samsung Galaxy F62 counts with a really longer battery lifetime than Xiaomi POCO M3 Pro 5G, because it has a 7000mAh battery size against 5000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.