Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.8 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2021-05-20 | 2016-06-10 |
| 6.37 x 2.97 x 0.35 inches | 5.86 x 2.95 x 0.39 inches |
| 6.70 ounces | 6.53 ounces |
| Cool Blue, POCO Yellow and Power Black | Camo green, Sandy gold and Titanium gray |
| -- | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 247.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 576 pixels per inch |
| -- | 500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 9.3 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 700 MT6833V chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| Cortex-A76, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC2 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.18 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 8.56 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.89 | 9.46 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | HSPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 3 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi POCO M3 Pro 5G is just a bit better than the Galaxy S7 Active, with an 80.8 score against 75.8. Even though the Xiaomi POCO M3 Pro 5G is just a little bit heavier than Galaxy S7 Active, it's somewhat thinner and notably newer. Xiaomi POCO M3 Pro 5G has a bit faster processing unit than Galaxy S7 Active, and although they both have 4 GB of RAM memory, the Xiaomi POCO M3 Pro 5G also has a larger number of cores.
Galaxy S7 Active features a sharper display than Xiaomi POCO M3 Pro 5G, because although it has a really smaller display, it also counts with a better pixel density and a better 1440 x 2560 resolution. Xiaomi POCO M3 Pro 5G shoots much better photos and videos than Galaxy S7 Active, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture which is not so good for low light images and videos, and they both have the same 30 fps video frame rates and the same 1920x1080 (Full HD) video resolution, the Xiaomi POCO M3 Pro 5G also counts with a lot more megapixels back-facing camera.
The Galaxy S7 Active counts with a quite bigger storage capacity to store more games and applications than Xiaomi POCO M3 Pro 5G, because although it has only 32 GB internal storage capacity, it also counts with a slot for SD memory cards that admits up to 200 GB. The Xiaomi POCO M3 Pro 5G has longer battery life than Galaxy S7 Active, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.