Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.8 | 80.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 8.0 Oreo |
| 2021-05-20 | 2020-04-04 |
| 6.37 x 2.97 x 0.35 inches | 6.24 x 3.18 x 0.56 inches |
| 6.70 ounces | 9.03 ounces |
| Cool Blue, POCO Yellow and Power Black | Black |
| -- | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 1105.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | -- |
| 405 pixels per inch | 576 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 700 MT6833V chipset | Samsung Exynos 9810 chipset |
| Cortex-A76, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Exynos M3 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC2 GPU | Mali-G72 MP18 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.89 | 8.14 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi POCO M3 Pro 5G has an overall score of 80.8, which is slightly better than Galaxy XCover FieldPro's overall score of 80.1. These phones use Android operating system, but the Xiaomi POCO M3 Pro 5G has the older 11 version while Galaxy XCover FieldPro has Android 8.0 Oreo. Xiaomi POCO M3 Pro 5G's design is newer, extremely lighter and way thinner than Galaxy XCover FieldPro.
Galaxy XCover FieldPro has a bit more powerful processing unit than Xiaomi POCO M3 Pro 5G. Both have 8 processing cores and the same RAM amount. The Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro has a little bit better screen than Xiaomi POCO M3 Pro 5G, because although it has a much smaller display, it also counts with a better display pixel density and a higher 1440 x 2560 pixels resolution.
The Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro counts with a much bigger memory capacity for games and applications than Xiaomi POCO M3 Pro 5G, and although they both have exactly the same internal storage capacity, the Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro also has a SD extension slot that admits up to 512 GB. Xiaomi POCO M3 Pro 5G shoots much better photos and videos than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has a tinier aperture which is worse for low-light images and videos, and they both have the same (Full HD) video definition and the same video frame rates, the Xiaomi POCO M3 Pro 5G also counts with a lot more MP camera in the back and a much bigger camera sensor taking more light and vivid colors.
Xiaomi POCO M3 Pro 5G counts with a bit better battery life than Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because it has an 11% greater battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.