Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.2 | 81.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Apple |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-11-27 | 2016-09-16 |
| 6.39 x 3.04 x 0.38 inches | 5.44 x 2.64 x 0.28 inches |
| 6.98 ounces | 4.87 ounces |
| Cool blue, Power black and Yellow | Black, Gold, Jet black, Red, Rose gold and Silver |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 149.00 | $ 849.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 4.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 1334 x 750 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 396 pixels per inch | 326 pixels per inch |
| -- | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 SM6115 chipset | Apple A10 Fusion APL1W24 (16 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | 64-bit (Quad-Core 2340 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 2 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | PowerVR 7XT GT7600 Plus GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.78 | 9.68 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 6000mAh Battery | 1960mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 7.52 | 3.84 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
IPhone 7 is a little bit better than Xiaomi Poco M3, getting an 81.6 score against 78.2. The iPhone 7 body is noticeably thinner and much lighter than the Xiaomi Poco M3, despite of the fact that it was released 4 years before. IPhone 7 has a little bit better hardware performance than Xiaomi Poco M3, although it has 2 GB less RAM and an inferior number of cores.
The Apple iPhone 7 has a bit better looking screen than Xiaomi Poco M3, although it has a lot smaller screen, a way worse 750 x 1334px resolution and a little bit lower count of pixels per inch in the screen. The Xiaomi Poco M3 captures much clearer pictures and videos than Apple iPhone 7, and although they both have the same aperture, the same 30 frames per second video frame rates and the same 1920x1080 video resolution, the Xiaomi Poco M3 also has a much larger back-facing camera sensor and a much better 48 MP resolution back facing camera.
The iPhone 7 counts with a bigger memory capacity for games and applications than Xiaomi Poco M3, because although it has no external SD slot, it also counts with 256 GB internal memory. Xiaomi Poco M3 counts with a much better battery duration than Apple iPhone 7, because it has a 206% more battery capacity.
Although iPhone 7 is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than the Xiaomi Poco M3, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as Xiaomi Poco M3. So if you want that extra features, you can buy iPhone 7, but if you don't you can save some money and buy the Xiaomi Poco M3, resigning some specs and features.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.