Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.2 | 87.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Apple |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-11-27 | 2017-09-22 |
| 6.39 x 3.04 x 0.38 inches | 6.24 x 3.07 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.98 ounces | 7.13 ounces |
| Cool blue, Power black and Yellow | Gold, Red, Silver and Space gray |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 149.00 | $ 949.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 396 pixels per inch | 401 pixels per inch |
| -- | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 SM6115 chipset | Apple A11 Bionic APL1W72 (10 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | 64-bit Monsoon and Mistral, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2390 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Apple 3-core GPU GPU |
| 9.09 | 10.17 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.78 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 6000mAh Battery | 2691mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 7.52 | 4.64 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The iPhone 8 Plus is better than the Xiaomi Poco M3, getting a score of 87.1 against 78.2. IPhone 8 Plus is an extremely older and just a little heavier phone than Xiaomi Poco M3, but Apple made it thinner anyway. The Apple iPhone 8 Plus counts with a superior processor than Xiaomi Poco M3, because although it has lesser cpu cores (but faster) and a lower amount of RAM memory, it also counts with a 64-bit CPU.
The Apple iPhone 8 Plus has a little sharper display than Xiaomi Poco M3, because although it has a bit worse 1080 x 1920 pixels resolution and a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a bit higher pixels amount in each inch in the screen. Apple iPhone 8 Plus has more memory for applications and games than Xiaomi Poco M3, because although it has no slot for an external memory card, it also counts with 256 GB internal storage.
Xiaomi Poco M3 counts with just a bit better camera than iPhone 8 Plus, because although it has lower 30 frames per second video frame rate, and they both have the same (Full HD) video quality and the same aperture, the Xiaomi Poco M3 also counts with a way larger sensor providing a lot higher image quality and a lot better resolution back-facing camera.
Xiaomi Poco M3 has a much better battery performance than iPhone 8 Plus, because it has a 123% greater battery size.
Although Apple iPhone 8 Plus is a better device, it costs a lot more than Xiaomi Poco M3, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as Xiaomi Poco M3. So if you want that extra features, you can buy the Apple iPhone 8 Plus, otherwise you can save some dollars and get the Xiaomi Poco M3, letting go some features and specs.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.