Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.2 | 84.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Apple |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-11-27 | 2018-09-21 |
| 6.39 x 3.04 x 0.38 inches | 5.65 x 2.79 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.98 ounces | 6.24 ounces |
| Cool blue, Power black and Yellow | Gold, Silver and Space gray |
| Plastic and Plastic | Glass and Stainless steel |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 149.00 | $ 999.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2436 x 1125 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 396 pixels per inch | 463 pixels per inch |
| -- | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 SM6115 chipset | Apple A12 Bionic APL1W81 (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | 64-bit Vortex and Tempest, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2490 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Apple 4-core GPU GPU |
| 9.09 | 10.26 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.78 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 6000mAh Battery | 2659mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 7.52 | 4.64 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The iPhone XS has a general score of 84.2, which is a bit better than the Xiaomi Poco M3's general score of 78.2. The iPhone XS design is somewhat lighter and way thinner than the Xiaomi Poco M3, despite of the fact that it was released many years before. IPhone XS has a quite better hardware performance than Xiaomi Poco M3, because although it has 2 lesser CPU cores , and they both have 4 GB of RAM memory, the iPhone XS also counts with a 64-bit CPU.
IPhone XS features a much better display than Xiaomi Poco M3, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a slightly better 1125 x 2436 pixels resolution and a just a bit greater pixels density. The Xiaomi Poco M3 counts with a much greater memory capacity for games and applications than iPhone XS, and although they both have the same internal memory, the Xiaomi Poco M3 also has a SD memory card expansion slot that supports a maximum of 512 GB.
The Xiaomi Poco M3 counts with a really longer battery duration than iPhone XS, because it has a 126% more battery size. Xiaomi Poco M3 has a bit better camera than iPhone XS, because although it has slower video frame rate, and they both have the same (Full HD) video quality and a F1.8 camera aperture, the Xiaomi Poco M3 also counts with a way better 48 mega-pixels resolution camera in the back and a much bigger camera sensor capturing way better quality photos.
Although iPhone XS is a better device, it is way more expensive than Xiaomi Poco M3, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as the Xiaomi Poco M3. If you want to save some money, you can buy Xiaomi Poco M3, letting go a couple features, but you will get the most with your savings.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.