Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.2 | 80.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-11-27 | 2018-10-18 |
| 6.39 x 3.04 x 0.38 inches | 6.22 x 3.02 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.98 ounces | 6.49 ounces |
| Cool blue, Power black and Yellow | Black, Pink and White |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 149.00 | $ 194.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2960 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 396 pixels per inch | 522 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 SM6115 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.78 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 6000mAh Battery | 3430mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 7.52 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 3 XL has a global score of 80.7, which is a little bit better than Xiaomi Poco M3's overall score of 78.2. Google Pixel 3 XL's body is thinner and a little bit lighter than the Xiaomi Poco M3, even though it was released 2 years before. Google Pixel 3 XL has a little better performance than Xiaomi Poco M3. Both have 4 GB of RAM memory and a Octa-Core processor.
The Google Pixel 3 XL counts with a bit sharper screen than Xiaomi Poco M3, because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with a better number of pixels per inch of display and a higher resolution of 1440 x 2960 pixels. The Xiaomi Poco M3 takes better photos and videos than Google Pixel 3 XL, and although they both have the same (Full HD) video quality, the same 30 frames per second video frame rate and the same aperture, the Xiaomi Poco M3 also has a way bigger back camera sensor which gives a way higher photo and video quality and a lot more MP camera.
Xiaomi Poco M3 has a very superior memory for applications and games than Google Pixel 3 XL, and although they both have equal internal storage capacity, the Xiaomi Poco M3 also has a slot for an external memory card that holds up to 512 GB. The Xiaomi Poco M3 features a much longer battery lifetime than Google Pixel 3 XL, because it has a 75% bigger battery size.
Although Google Pixel 3 XL is a better device, it is more expensive than the Xiaomi Poco M3, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as the Xiaomi Poco M3. If you prefer to save some money, you can get the Xiaomi Poco M3, giving up a couple features and specs, but you'll get the most out of your budget.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.