Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.2 | 81.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-11-27 | 2019-10-24 |
| 6.39 x 3.04 x 0.38 inches | 5.79 x 2.71 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.98 ounces | 5.71 ounces |
| Cool blue, Power black and Yellow | Clearly white, Just black and Oh so orange |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 149.00 | $ 339.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2280 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 396 pixels per inch | 443 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 SM6115 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.78 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 6000mAh Battery | 2800mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 7.52 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 4 has a global score of 81.9, which is just a bit better than the Xiaomi Poco M3's score of 78.2. The Google Pixel 4 construction is thinner and lighter than the Xiaomi Poco M3, although it was released around 13 months before. The Google Pixel 4 counts with a slightly better looking screen than Xiaomi Poco M3, because although it has a bit smaller display and a little bit lower resolution of 1080 x 2280 pixels, it also counts with a little bit more pixels per inch of screen.
Google Pixel 4 counts with a little better hardware performance than Xiaomi Poco M3, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Google Pixel 4 also has a greater amount of RAM memory. Xiaomi Poco M3 counts with a superior memory capacity to store more apps and games than Google Pixel 4, and although they both have exactly the same 64 GB internal memory capacity, the Xiaomi Poco M3 also has a slot for SD memory cards that allows a maximum of 512 GB.
Xiaomi Poco M3 counts with a much longer battery performance than Google Pixel 4, because it has 6000mAh of battery capacity. Xiaomi Poco M3 captures better pictures and videos than Google Pixel 4, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not recommended for low-light images and video, and they both have the same video frame rates and the same video resolution, the Xiaomi Poco M3 also counts with a camera with lot more mega pixels and a lot bigger back-facing camera sensor which provides a way better image and video quality.
Although Google Pixel 4 is a better device, it is way more expensive than the Xiaomi Poco M3, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as the Xiaomi Poco M3. If you prefer to save a few dollars, you can buy Xiaomi Poco M3, giving up a few specs and features, but you'll get the most out of your savings.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.