Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.2 | 82.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-11-27 | 2019-10-24 |
| 6.39 x 3.04 x 0.38 inches | 6.31 x 2.96 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.98 ounces | 6.81 ounces |
| Cool blue, Power black and Yellow | Clearly white, Just black and Oh so orange |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 149.00 | $ 487.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 3040 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 396 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 SM6115 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.78 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 6000mAh Battery | 3700mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 7.52 | 5.68 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 4 XL is slightly better than the Xiaomi Poco M3, with a general score of 82.9 against 78.2. The Google Pixel 4 XL is an older device than the Xiaomi Poco M3, but it's thinner and a bit lighter anyway. The Google Pixel 4 XL features a little faster processing unit than Xiaomi Poco M3, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Google Pixel 4 XL also has a greater amount of RAM.
Google Pixel 4 XL features just a bit better looking display than Xiaomi Poco M3, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a greater pixels count per screen inch and a better resolution of 1440 x 3040. Xiaomi Poco M3 shoots better photographs and videos than Google Pixel 4 XL, because although it has a smaller camera aperture which is worse for low light photography and video, and they both have the same 30 frames per second video frame rate and the same 1920x1080 video quality, the Xiaomi Poco M3 also counts with a much bigger camera sensor providing a lot higher image quality and a camera with a way higher resolution.
The Xiaomi Poco M3 has a superior storage capacity to install applications and games than Google Pixel 4 XL, and although they both have equal internal memory, the Xiaomi Poco M3 also has an external memory slot that admits up to 512 GB. The Xiaomi Poco M3 has a really longer battery duration than Google Pixel 4 XL, because it has a 62% larger battery capacity.
Although Google Pixel 4 XL is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than the Xiaomi Poco M3, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as the Xiaomi Poco M3. If you are trying to save a few dollars, you can buy Xiaomi Poco M3, letting go a few features and specs, but you will get the most with your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.