Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.2 | 92.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | |
| Android 10 | Android 14 |
| 2020-11-27 | 2024-03-22 |
| 6.39 x 3.04 x 0.38 inches | 6.40 x 2.98 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.98 ounces | 8.36 ounces |
| Cool blue, Power black and Yellow | Agate Grey and Frozen Berry |
| Plastic and Plastic | Glass and Titanium |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 149.00 | $ 1400.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2800 x 1280 pixels |
| IPS LCD | LTPO |
| 396 pixels per inch | 453 pixels per inch |
| -- | 5000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 10.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 SM6115 chipset | Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | 1x Cortex-X4 3.3GHz, 3x Cortex-A720 3.2GHz, 2x Cortex- A720 3.0GHz, 2x Cortex-A520 2.3GHz, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3300 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 24 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Adreno 750 GPU |
| 9.09 | 10.08 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 1 TB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 23.2 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.40 aperture |
| -- | 13.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.67 inches (1/1.49") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 10.78 | 12.21 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 6000mAh Battery | 5600mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 7.52 | 7.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass and Gyroscope |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Edition has an overall score of 92.1, which is better than the Xiaomi Poco M3's overall score of 78.2. Both of these phones come with Android operating system, but Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Edition has a more recent 14 version while Xiaomi Poco M3 has Android 10. Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Edition's design is a lot newer and a little bit thinner than the Xiaomi Poco M3's, but it is somewhat heavier.
Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Edition has a much sharper display than Xiaomi Poco M3, because it has a quite bigger screen, a better 1280 x 2800 resolution and a bit greater pixels quantity per inch of screen. Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Edition counts with a superior CPU than Xiaomi Poco M3, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Edition also has a higher amount of RAM memory.
Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Edition features a much better storage capacity for games and applications than Xiaomi Poco M3, because although it has no external memory slot, it also counts with 960 GB more internal memory capacity. The Xiaomi Poco M3 counts with a little longer battery duration than Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Edition, because it has a 6000mAh battery size against 5600mAh.
The Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Edition has a much better camera than Xiaomi Poco M3, because it has a better resolution back facing camera, a way better 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, a lot bigger diafragm aperture and a lot bigger sensor which provides a lot better photo and video quality.
Although Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Edition is a better device, it is way more expensive than the Xiaomi Poco M3, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as Xiaomi Poco M3. So if you want that extra specs, you can buy Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Edition, but if you don't you can save a couple dollars and buy the Xiaomi Poco M3, giving up a couple specs and features.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.