Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.2 | 77.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | HTC |
| Android 10 | Android 5.0 |
| 2020-11-27 | 2015-03-01 |
| 6.39 x 3.04 x 0.38 inches | 5.69 x 2.74 x 0.38 inches |
| 6.98 ounces | 5.54 ounces |
| Cool blue, Power black and Yellow | Black, Gold, Gray and Pink |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminium |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 149.00 | $ 178.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) |
| IPS LCD | S-LCD 3 |
| 396 pixels per inch | 441 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8 | 9.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 SM6115 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | 64-bit ARM Cortex-A57 (Quad-Core 2000 MHz + Quad-Core 1500 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Adreno 430 (600 MHz) GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.99 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 8.12 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 20.00 MP + 4.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| -- | 27.80mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.42 inches (1/2.4") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 10.78 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 6000mAh Battery | 2840mAh Li-Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | 391 hours standby time 25.4 hours talk time |
| 7.52 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Infra-red port | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Poco M3 is a little bit better than HTC One M9, with a general score of 78.2 against 77.7. Both of these phones work with Android operating system, but Xiaomi Poco M3 has newer 10 version and HTC One M9 has Android 5.0. The Xiaomi Poco M3 is a a lot heavier phone than the HTC One M9, but both have the same thickness.
The HTC One M9 has a bit superior processor than Xiaomi Poco M3, because although it has 1 GB lesser RAM, and they both have 8 processing cores, the HTC One M9 also counts with a 64-bits CPU and an extra graphics processing unit. HTC One M9 counts with a more vivid display than Xiaomi Poco M3, because although it has a really smaller screen and a little bit worse 1920 x 1080px resolution, it also counts with a just a bit more pixels per inch of screen.
The Xiaomi Poco M3 captures just a bit better photographs and videos than HTC One M9, and although they both have the same video frame rates and the same 1920x1080 (Full HD) video resolution, the Xiaomi Poco M3 also has a back camera with way more MP, a bigger sensor shooting better quality pictures and videos and a larger camera aperture for better images and videos in poorly lited situations.
The Xiaomi Poco M3 counts with a much bigger memory for applications, games, photos and videos than HTC One M9, because it has 32 GB more internal storage capacity and a SD extension slot that holds a maximum of 512 GB. The Xiaomi Poco M3 counts with a much better battery duration than HTC One M9, because it has a 6000mAh battery capacity instead of 2840mAh.
Xiaomi Poco M3 not only is the best phones in our current comparison, but it's also by far the cheapest one.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.