Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.2 | 81.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | LG |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-11-27 | 2018-06-08 |
| 6.39 x 3.04 x 0.38 inches | 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches |
| 6.98 ounces | 5.57 ounces |
| Cool blue, Power black and Yellow | Black and Gray |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 149.00 | $ 261.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | P-OLED |
| 396 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 SM6115 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| -- | 30.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.78 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 6000mAh Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 7.52 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG V35 ThinQ has a general score of 81.3, which is a little bit better than the Xiaomi Poco M3's 78.2 general score. Even though LG V35 ThinQ is noticeably older than the Xiaomi Poco M3, it's construction is extremely lighter and extremely thinner. LG V35 ThinQ counts with a little bit better display than Xiaomi Poco M3, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a higher screen density and a better 1440 x 2880 resolution.
The LG V35 ThinQ has a bit more powerful processing unit than Xiaomi Poco M3, and although they both have 8 cores, the LG V35 ThinQ also has 2 GB more RAM. Xiaomi Poco M3 features a little bit better camera than LG V35 ThinQ, because although it has a tinier aperture, and they both have the same video frame rates and the same video resolution, the Xiaomi Poco M3 also counts with a way bigger back camera sensor capturing lot better quality photographs and videos and a back facing camera with a much better 48 mega-pixels resolution.
LG V35 ThinQ counts with a lot bigger storage capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Xiaomi Poco M3, and although they both have the same 64 GB internal memory, the LG V35 ThinQ also has a slot for an SD memory card that allows a maximum of 1,95 TB. Xiaomi Poco M3 has a way better battery duration than LG V35 ThinQ, because it has 6000mAh of battery capacity.
Although LG V35 ThinQ is a better device, it costs a lot more money than Xiaomi Poco M3, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as the Xiaomi Poco M3. So if you want that extra features and specs, you can buy LG V35 ThinQ, but if you don't you can save some money and buy the Xiaomi Poco M3, letting go a couple specs and features.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.