Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.2 | 79.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Motorola |
| Android 10 | Android 15 |
| 2020-11-27 | 2025-04-24 |
| 6.39 x 3.04 x 0.38 inches | -- |
| 6.98 ounces | 7.02 ounces |
| Cool blue, Power black and Yellow | -- |
| Plastic and Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 149.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | -- |
| IPS LCD | LTPO |
| 396 pixels per inch | -- |
| -- | 4500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 5.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 SM6115 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite SM8750-AB (3 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 16 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Adreno 830 GPU |
| 9.09 | 6.3 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video |
| 10.78 | 11.99 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | -- |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 7.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 6000mAh Battery | 4700mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 7.52 | 6.56 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.4 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) is slightly better than Xiaomi Poco M3, having a 79.2 score against 78.2. The Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) body is much newer and noticeably thinner, but just a little bit heavier than Xiaomi Poco M3. Both phones in our current comparison have Android OS, but the Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) has newer 15 version while Xiaomi Poco M3 has Android 10, giving you some additional features.
Xiaomi Poco M3 features a much faster processing unit than Motorola Razr Ultra (2025), although it has less RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores. Xiaomi Poco M3 has a lot better display than Motorola Razr Ultra (2025), although it has a little smaller display. The Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) shoots much better pictures and videos than Xiaomi Poco M3, and although they both have the same camera aperture, the Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) also has a much better video definition and a more mega-pixels back-facing camera.
The Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) counts with a superior memory capacity to store more games and applications than Xiaomi Poco M3, because although it has no SD extension slot, it also counts with 512 GB internal storage. The Xiaomi Poco M3 has improved battery performance than Motorola Razr Ultra (2025), because it has a 6000mAh battery capacity instead of 4700mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.