Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.2 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | |
| Android 10 | Android 9.0 Pie |
| 2020-11-27 | 2019-10-16 |
| 6.39 x 3.04 x 0.38 inches | 6.76 x 3.09 x 0.38 inches |
| 6.98 ounces | 7.58 ounces |
| Cool blue, Power black and Yellow | Cyber shade |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 149.00 | $ 600.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 396 pixels per inch | 385 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 SM6115 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (15 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) slow motion video |
| 10.78 | 11.88 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 6000mAh Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 7.52 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Poco M3 has a general score of 78.2, which is a little bit better than nubia Red Magic 3S's 75.8 global score. Both of these phones include Android operating system, but Xiaomi Poco M3 has the previous 10 version while nubia Red Magic 3S has Android 9.0 Pie version. The Xiaomi Poco M3 is a a little bit lighter cellphone than nubia Red Magic 3S, but they are 0.38inches thick.
Nubia Red Magic 3S counts with a bit better CPU than Xiaomi Poco M3, and although they both have the same number of cores, the nubia Red Magic 3S also has a larger amount of RAM. The nubia Red Magic 3S counts with a slightly better looking display than Xiaomi Poco M3, because although it has a just a bit inferior pixels count per inch of screen, and they both have an equal resolution of 1080 x 2340 pixels, the nubia Red Magic 3S also counts with a little bigger display.
The nubia Red Magic 3S features a greater storage to store more games and applications than Xiaomi Poco M3, because although it has no SD extension slot, it also counts with more internal memory. Nubia Red Magic 3S shoots much clearer photographs and videos than Xiaomi Poco M3, and although they both have a camera with a 48 MP resolution and a 0.5 inches back camera sensor, the nubia Red Magic 3S also has a larger camera aperture for better low-light photography and video and a way better video quality.
The Xiaomi Poco M3 has longer battery lifetime than nubia Red Magic 3S, because it has a 20% bigger battery size.
In addition to being the best phone of the ones in this comparison, Xiaomi Poco M3 is also a bargain compared to the other phones, which makes it a no doubt choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.