Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.2 | 76.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | |
| Android 10 | Android 10 |
| 2020-11-27 | 2020-09-02 |
| 6.39 x 3.04 x 0.38 inches | 6.64 x 3.07 x 0.38 inches |
| 6.98 ounces | 7.76 ounces |
| Cool blue, Power black and Yellow | Sonic silver |
| Plastic and Plastic | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 149.00 | $ 579.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 396 pixels per inch | 385 pixels per inch |
| -- | 600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 SM6115 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (15 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.78 | 12.32 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 6000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 7.52 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Poco M3 has a general score of 78.2, which is a bit better than nubia Red Magic 5S's 76.2 global score. The Xiaomi Poco M3 is a somewhat lighter phone than nubia Red Magic 5S, but they have the same thickness. These phones work with the same Android 10 operating system. The nubia Red Magic 5S features a little better processing power than Xiaomi Poco M3, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the nubia Red Magic 5S also has 4 GB more RAM memory.
The nubia Red Magic 5S counts with a little bit better looking display than Xiaomi Poco M3, because although it has a bit lower quantity of pixels per inch in the display, and they both have exactly the same 1080 x 2340 resolution, the nubia Red Magic 5S also counts with a little bit bigger screen.
Nubia Red Magic 5S captures much better videos and photos than Xiaomi Poco M3, and although they both have the same aperture, the nubia Red Magic 5S also has a lot more megapixels back camera, a lot higher video quality and a bigger camera sensor capturing more light and vivid colors. The Xiaomi Poco M3 features a bigger storage capacity to install applications and games than nubia Red Magic 5S, because although it has only 64 GB internal storage, it also counts with a slot for SD memory cards that allows up to 512 GB.
Xiaomi Poco M3 features superior battery duration than nubia Red Magic 5S, because it has 6000mAh of battery capacity.
Even being the best phone in our current comparison, Xiaomi Poco M3 is also by far the cheapest.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.