Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.2 | 79.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 14 |
| 2020-11-27 | 2023-12-11 |
| 6.39 x 3.04 x 0.38 inches | 6.34 x 3.01 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.98 ounces | 6.95 ounces |
| Cool blue, Power black and Yellow | Brave Black, Fantasy Blue, Optimistic Blue and Personality Yellow |
| Plastic and Plastic | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 149.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 396 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 SM6115 chipset | Exynos 1280 (5 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Mali-G68 GPU |
| 9.09 | 6.12 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.76") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 10.78 | 11.11 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 9.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 6000mAh Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 7.52 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A25 5G is slightly better than Xiaomi Poco M3, having a score of 79.9 against 78.2. These phones include Android OS, but the Samsung Galaxy A25 5G has newer 14 version while Xiaomi Poco M3 has Android 10 version, so it counts with a couple additional features and performance optimizations. Samsung Galaxy A25 5G is a noticeably newer phone, and it is also just a bit lighter and somewhat thinner than Xiaomi Poco M3.
Xiaomi Poco M3 has a much greater processing power than Galaxy A25 5G, although it has a lower amount of RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores. The Galaxy A25 5G counts with a little more vivid screen than Xiaomi Poco M3. Both of them have a screen of the same size, the same exact 1080 x 2340 pixels resolution and the same display pixels density.
Galaxy A25 5G features a way bigger storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Xiaomi Poco M3, because it has an external SD slot that supports a maximum of 1 TB and 64 GB more internal storage capacity. Xiaomi Poco M3 features better battery duration than Galaxy A25 5G, because it has 6000mAh of battery capacity instead of 5000mAh.
Galaxy A25 5G shoots slightly better pictures and videos than Xiaomi Poco M3, because although it has a lot smaller back camera sensor which offers a much lower image and video quality, and they both have a same size diafragm aperture, the Galaxy A25 5G also counts with a back-facing camera with more MP and a much higher 3840x2160 video definition.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.