Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.2 | 79.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 14 |
| 2020-11-27 | 2024-03-11 |
| 6.39 x 3.04 x 0.38 inches | 6.37 x 3.07 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.98 ounces | 7.37 ounces |
| Cool blue, Power black and Yellow | -- |
| Plastic and Plastic | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 149.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 396 pixels per inch | 390 pixels per inch |
| -- | 500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 SM6115 chipset | Exynos 1380 (5 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Mali-G68 MP5 GPU |
| 9.09 | 6.12 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.51 inches (1/1.96") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 10.78 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 6000mAh Battery | 5000mAh Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 7.52 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy A35 5G is just a bit better than Xiaomi Poco M3, getting a global score of 79.4 against 78.2. Although Galaxy A35 5G is just a bit heavier than Xiaomi Poco M3, it's somewhat thinner and also a lot newer. Both phones in this comparison review use Android operating system, but the Galaxy A35 5G has a newer 14 version while Xiaomi Poco M3 has Android 10 version.
The Galaxy A35 5G counts with a little more vivid screen than Xiaomi Poco M3, because although it has a little bit lower display pixel density, and they both have the same 1080 x 2340 resolution, the Galaxy A35 5G also counts with a bit bigger screen. Xiaomi Poco M3 features a lot better processing power than Galaxy A35 5G, although it has a lower amount of RAM, they both have 8 processing cores.
The Xiaomi Poco M3 counts with a better memory capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Galaxy A35 5G, because although it has only 64 GB internal memory, it also counts with an external memory slot that holds a maximum of 512 GB. The Xiaomi Poco M3 counts with superior battery life than Samsung Galaxy A35 5G, because it has a 6000mAh battery size against 5000mAh.
The Galaxy A35 5G shoots just a bit better photographs and videos than Xiaomi Poco M3, and although they both have a F1.8 camera aperture, the Galaxy A35 5G also has a much better 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, a camera in the back with a higher 50 MP resolution and a larger sensor providing a better image quality.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.