Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.2 | 83.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-11-27 | 2019-03-15 |
| 6.39 x 3.04 x 0.38 inches | 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.98 ounces | 5.86 ounces |
| Cool blue, Power black and Yellow | Black, Blue, Coral and White |
| Plastic and Plastic | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 149.00 | $ 202.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 396 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 SM6115 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 25.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.78 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 6000mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 7.52 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A50 has a score of 83.8, which is just a bit better than Xiaomi Poco M3's 78.2 score. The Galaxy A50 design is somewhat lighter and much thinner than the Xiaomi Poco M3, even though it was released around 21 months before. The Galaxy A50 features a little more vivid screen than Xiaomi Poco M3, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, and they both have an equal 1080 x 2340 resolution, the Galaxy A50 also counts with a just a little better display density.
The Galaxy A50 counts with a lot bigger memory for games and applications than Xiaomi Poco M3, and although they both have an external SD slot that holds a maximum of 512 GB, the Galaxy A50 also has 128 GB internal storage capacity. The Samsung Galaxy A50 has a bit better CPU than Xiaomi Poco M3. Both have a 4 GB RAM memory and 8 cpu cores.
Xiaomi Poco M3 captures just a bit better photographs and videos than Galaxy A50, because although it has a smaller aperture, and they both have the same 1920x1080 (Full HD) video resolution and the same video frame rate, the Xiaomi Poco M3 also counts with a lot larger back-facing camera sensor taking more light and vivid colors and a camera in the back with a lot higher 48 MP resolution.
The Xiaomi Poco M3 counts with a really longer battery duration than Galaxy A50, because it has a 6000mAh battery size.
Samsung Galaxy A50 is more expensive than the Xiaomi Poco M3, but it's still a convenient choice, as you can get a lot more features for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.