Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.2 | 91.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 12, 11 |
| 2020-11-27 | 2021-03-19 |
| 6.39 x 3.04 x 0.38 inches | 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.98 ounces | 6.67 ounces |
| Cool blue, Power black and Yellow | -- |
| Plastic and Plastic | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 149.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 396 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 SM6115 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 (8 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.78 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 6000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 7.52 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A52 5G has a general score of 91.3, which is better than the Xiaomi Poco M3's overall score of 78.2. Samsung Galaxy A52 5G's design is somewhat thinner and a little bit lighter than the Xiaomi Poco M3, even though both were released with only 4 months difference. Both devices in our current comparison include Android operating system, but Samsung Galaxy A52 5G has a more recent 12 version while Xiaomi Poco M3 has Android 10 version.
The Galaxy A52 5G features just a bit better screen than Xiaomi Poco M3, and although they both have a display with the same size, the Galaxy A52 5G also has a quite better 1080 x 2400 resolution and a little bit better display pixels density. The Galaxy A52 5G counts with just a bit better performance than Xiaomi Poco M3, and although they both have 8 cores, the Galaxy A52 5G also has more RAM.
Galaxy A52 5G has a superior camera than Xiaomi Poco M3, and although they both have the same aperture, the Galaxy A52 5G also has a way higher 3840x2160 video quality, a larger back camera sensor capturing higher quality videos and photographs and a way better 64 mega pixels resolution camera. Samsung Galaxy A52 5G has a superior storage capacity for games and applications than Xiaomi Poco M3, because it has an external SD slot that holds a maximum of 1 TB and 128 GB internal storage capacity.
Xiaomi Poco M3 has improved battery duration than Galaxy A52 5G, because it has 6000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.