Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.2 | 76.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2020-11-27 | 2019-04-26 |
| 6.39 x 3.04 x 0.38 inches | 6.47 x 3.02 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.98 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Cool blue, Power black and Yellow | Black, Blue, Pink and White |
| Plastic and Plastic | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 149.00 | $ 299.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 396 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 SM6115 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.78 | 3.52 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 6000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 7.52 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Poco M3 has an overall score of 78.2, which is a little bit better than Samsung Galaxy A70's 76.9 score. Both phones in this review include the same Android 10 OS. Xiaomi Poco M3 is a newer cellphone than Samsung Galaxy A70, but it is a little bit heavier and somewhat thicker. The Samsung Galaxy A70 features a bit more powerful processing unit than Xiaomi Poco M3, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Samsung Galaxy A70 also has a greater amount of RAM.
Xiaomi Poco M3 and Samsung Galaxy A70 have similar displays, because although the Samsung Galaxy A70 has a just a little lower display pixels density, it also counts with a slightly higher 1080 x 2400px resolution and a little bit bigger display. The Galaxy A70 has a superior storage capacity for apps and games than Xiaomi Poco M3, and although they both have a SD memory card expansion slot that holds a maximum of 512 GB, the Galaxy A70 also has 64 GB more internal storage capacity.
Xiaomi Poco M3 counts with a lot better camera than Samsung Galaxy A70, because although it has a smaller aperture, and they both have the same 30 frames per second video frame rates and the same (Full HD) video definition, the Xiaomi Poco M3 also counts with a much bigger back camera sensor. Xiaomi Poco M3 counts with improved battery performance than Samsung Galaxy A70, because it has 6000mAh of battery capacity.
Xiaomi Poco M3 is not only the best devices in our comparison, but it's also very cheap compared to the other devices, making it very easy to pick between these devices.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.