Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.2 | 89 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-11-27 | 2019-08-23 |
| 6.39 x 3.04 x 0.38 inches | 5.94 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.98 ounces | 5.89 ounces |
| Cool blue, Power black and Yellow | Aura black, Aura glow and Aura white |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 149.00 | $ 950.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2280 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 396 pixels per inch | 400 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 SM6115 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.78 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 6000mAh Battery | 3500mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 7.52 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Note10 has a score of 89, which is better than Xiaomi Poco M3's global score of 78.2. The Galaxy Note10 design is somewhat thinner and lighter than Xiaomi Poco M3, despite of the fact that it was released around a year before. Samsung Galaxy Note10 counts with a bit better hardware performance than Xiaomi Poco M3, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Samsung Galaxy Note10 also has a larger amount of RAM memory.
Galaxy Note10 has a little bit better screen than Xiaomi Poco M3, because although it has a little smaller screen and a little bit lower resolution of 1080 x 2280px, it also counts with a just a bit higher number of pixels in each inch of screen. The Xiaomi Poco M3 shoots just a bit better photographs and videos than Samsung Galaxy Note10, because although it has a tinier aperture and worse 30 fps video frame rates, and they both have the same video quality, the Xiaomi Poco M3 also counts with a back camera with much more mega-pixels and a way larger camera sensor which gives a lot better photo and video quality.
The Galaxy Note10 features a bigger storage capacity to store more apps and games than Xiaomi Poco M3, because although it has no slot for an SD memory card, it also counts with 192 GB more internal memory. Xiaomi Poco M3 features a much longer battery duration than Galaxy Note10, because it has a 6000mAh battery size.
Although Samsung Galaxy Note10 is a better device, it costs a lot more money than the Xiaomi Poco M3, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as Xiaomi Poco M3. So if you want that extra features, you can buy the Samsung Galaxy Note10, but if you don't you can save some dollars and get the Xiaomi Poco M3, giving up some specs and features.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.