Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.2 | 88.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2020-11-27 | 2019-03-08 |
| 6.39 x 3.04 x 0.38 inches | 5.90 x 2.77 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.98 ounces | 5.54 ounces |
| Cool blue, Power black and Yellow | Flamingo pink, Prism black, Prism blue, Prism green and Prism white |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 149.00 | $ 281.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 3040 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 396 pixels per inch | 551 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 SM6115 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.78 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 6000mAh Battery | 3400mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 7.52 | 5.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy S10 is better than the Xiaomi Poco M3, having a overall score of 88.3 against 78.2. The Galaxy S10 is an older device than the Xiaomi Poco M3, but Samsung managed to make it thinner and noticeably lighter anyway. Both of these phones work with Android OS, but the Galaxy S10 has the newer 11 version while Xiaomi Poco M3 has Android 10 version.
The Samsung Galaxy S10 counts with a brighter display than Xiaomi Poco M3, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a better screen density and a better resolution of 1440 x 3040. The Galaxy S10 counts with a bit superior processing unit than Xiaomi Poco M3, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Galaxy S10 also has 4 GB more RAM memory.
The Galaxy S10 has a very superior memory for games and applications than Xiaomi Poco M3, and although they both have an external memory slot that holds a maximum of 512 GB, the Galaxy S10 also has more internal memory capacity. Xiaomi Poco M3 captures clearer videos and photos than Galaxy S10, because although it has slower video frame rate and a tinier camera aperture which is not good for low light photography, and they both have the same 1920x1080 (Full HD) video definition, the Xiaomi Poco M3 also counts with a lot bigger camera sensor shooting much better quality videos and pictures and a much higher resolution back-facing camera.
Xiaomi Poco M3 counts with a much better battery life than Galaxy S10, because it has a 6000mAh battery capacity.
The Galaxy S10 is a lot more expensive than the Xiaomi Poco M3, but it's still a great choice, as you can get a lot more features for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.