Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.2 | 86.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-11-27 | 2019-03-08 |
| 6.39 x 3.04 x 0.38 inches | 5.60 x 2.75 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.98 ounces | 5.29 ounces |
| Cool blue, Power black and Yellow | Canary yellow, Flamingo pink, Prism black, Prism blue, Prism green, Prism silver and Prism white |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 149.00 | $ 408.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2280 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 396 pixels per inch | 435 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 SM6115 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.78 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 6000mAh Battery | 3100mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 7.52 | 5.12 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S10e is better than Xiaomi Poco M3, having an 86.3 score against 78.2. Galaxy S10e's body is lighter and thinner than Xiaomi Poco M3, even though it was released only 21 months before. Galaxy S10e has a little bit better performance than Xiaomi Poco M3, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the Galaxy S10e also has a larger amount of RAM.
The Galaxy S10e counts with a bit sharper display than Xiaomi Poco M3, because although it has a little worse resolution of 1080 x 2280 and a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a just a bit more pixels per screen inch. The Xiaomi Poco M3 counts with a bit better camera than Galaxy S10e, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not nice for low light photos and videos and worse 30 fps video frame rates, and they both have the same video resolution, the Xiaomi Poco M3 also counts with a lot higher 48 megapixels resolution camera and a lot bigger sensor capturing more light and vivid colors.
Samsung Galaxy S10e features a lot bigger storage capacity to install applications and games than Xiaomi Poco M3, and although they both have a slot for SD memory cards that holds a maximum of 512 GB, the Samsung Galaxy S10e also has 64 GB more internal memory capacity. Xiaomi Poco M3 features a very superior battery performance than Galaxy S10e, because it has 6000mAh of battery capacity.
Although Galaxy S10e is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than Xiaomi Poco M3, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as the Xiaomi Poco M3. If you prefer to save some money, you can get the Xiaomi Poco M3, giving up a few features and specs, but you will get the most with your savings.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.