Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.2 | 90.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 14 |
| 2020-11-27 | -- |
| 6.39 x 3.04 x 0.38 inches | -- |
| 6.98 ounces | -- |
| Cool blue, Power black and Yellow | -- |
| Plastic and Plastic | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Titanium |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 149.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 3088 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 396 pixels per inch | 501 pixels per inch |
| -- | 2600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 10.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 SM6115 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Yes GPU |
| 9.09 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 200.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 24.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.78 | 14.74 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 6000mAh Battery | 5000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 7.52 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S25 Ultra is much better than Xiaomi Poco M3, getting a 90.7 score against 78.2. Both phones we are comparing use Android operating system, but Galaxy S25 Ultra has a newer 14 version and Xiaomi Poco M3 has Android 10 version, counting with a couple additional features. The Galaxy S25 Ultra body is incredibly lighter and extremely thinner than Xiaomi Poco M3.
Galaxy S25 Ultra counts with a much more vibrant display than Xiaomi Poco M3, because it has a quite larger screen, a better resolution of 1440 x 3088px and a higher pixels density. The Xiaomi Poco M3 counts with a really superior performance than Galaxy S25 Ultra, although it has 8 GB less RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores.
Galaxy S25 Ultra has a way better camera than Xiaomi Poco M3, because it has a bigger camera aperture, a way bigger back-facing camera sensor which offers a much better photo and video quality, a lot higher 7680x4320 video quality and a lot more MP camera. Galaxy S25 Ultra has a bigger memory for games and applications than Xiaomi Poco M3, because although it has no SD card slot, it also counts with 256 GB internal memory.
Xiaomi Poco M3 features superior battery life than Galaxy S25 Ultra, because it has 6000mAh of battery capacity instead of 5000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.