Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.2 | 83.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Xiaomi |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-11-27 | 2018-04-03 |
| 6.39 x 3.04 x 0.38 inches | 5.94 x 2.95 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.98 ounces | 6.67 ounces |
| Cool blue, Power black and Yellow | Black and White |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Ceramic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 149.00 | $ 639.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 396 pixels per inch | 402 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 SM6115 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.78 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 6000mAh Battery | 3400mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 7.52 | 5.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s has an overall score of 83.8, which is a bit better than Xiaomi Poco M3's 78.2 global score. The Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s construction is a little lighter and somewhat thinner than the Xiaomi Poco M3, despite of the fact that it was released 3 years before. The Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s counts with a little bit better display than Xiaomi Poco M3, because although it has a bit lower 1080 x 2160 resolution and a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a bit greater pixels density.
The Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s counts with a bit better hardware performance than Xiaomi Poco M3, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s also has a larger amount of RAM memory. The Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s features a better memory to store more apps and games than Xiaomi Poco M3, because although it has no SD memory slot, it also counts with 256 GB internal storage capacity.
Xiaomi Poco M3 takes much clearer pictures and videos than Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s, and although they both have the same 30 frames per second video frame rates, the same 1920x1080 (Full HD) video quality and a same size camera aperture, the Xiaomi Poco M3 also has a lot more megapixels back-facing camera and a much bigger back-facing camera sensor shooting lot higher quality photographs.
Xiaomi Poco M3 features a superior battery life than Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s, because it has 6000mAh of battery capacity against 3400mAh.
Although Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s is a better device, it costs a lot more money than the Xiaomi Poco M3, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as Xiaomi Poco M3. So if you need that extra features, you can buy Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s, else you can save a couple dollars and buy the Xiaomi Poco M3, resigning some features and specs.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.