Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.5 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2021-11-11 | 2016-06-10 |
| 6.44 x 2.98 x 0.34 inches | 5.86 x 2.95 x 0.39 inches |
| 6.88 ounces | 6.53 ounces |
| Cool Blue, POCO Yellow and Power Black | Camo green, Sandy gold and Titanium gray |
| -- | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 247.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 399 pixels per inch | 576 pixels per inch |
| -- | 500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 9.3 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 810 5G MT6833 (6 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| Cortex-A76, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC2 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.36 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.02 | 8.56 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.67 | 9.46 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | HSPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 3 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Xiaomi POCO M4 Pro 5G has a global score of 81.5, which is a little bit better than the Samsung Galaxy S7 Active's global score of 75.8. The Xiaomi POCO M4 Pro 5G is a notably newer and thinner cellphone than Samsung Galaxy S7 Active, but it is just a little bit heavier. The Xiaomi POCO M4 Pro 5G counts with a bit better processing power than Galaxy S7 Active, and although they both have 4 GB of RAM memory, the Xiaomi POCO M4 Pro 5G also has a greater number of cores.
Galaxy S7 Active counts with a sharper screen than Xiaomi POCO M4 Pro 5G, because although it has a way smaller screen, it also counts with a greater pixel density and a higher 1440 x 2560 resolution. The Xiaomi POCO M4 Pro 5G has a lot bigger memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy S7 Active, because it has a SD memory slot that allows up to 1 TB and 32 GB more internal memory capacity.
Xiaomi POCO M4 Pro 5G features superior battery performance than Galaxy S7 Active, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity against 4000mAh. The Xiaomi POCO M4 Pro 5G captures better pictures and videos than Galaxy S7 Active, because although it has a tinier aperture which is worse for low-light images, and they both have the same (Full HD) video resolution, the Xiaomi POCO M4 Pro 5G also counts with better 60 frames per second video frame rate and a much more megapixels camera in the back.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.