Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.6 | 83.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 12 | -- |
| 2022-03-16 | 2019-03-15 |
| 6.29 x 2.91 x 0.32 inches | 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.33 ounces | 5.86 ounces |
| -- | Black, Blue, Coral and White |
| -- | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 202.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 411 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| 1000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio G96 MT6781 (12 nm) chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset |
| processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC2 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 6.12 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDHC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.42 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 25.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A50 is better than the Xiaomi POCO M4 Pro, having an 83.8 score against 72.6. Samsung Galaxy A50's design is just a bit thinner and a bit lighter than the Xiaomi POCO M4 Pro, despite of the fact that it was released many years before. Xiaomi POCO M4 Pro has a bit sharper display than Galaxy A50, and although they both have a display of the same size, the Xiaomi POCO M4 Pro also has a little bit more pixels per screen inch and a little bit higher 1080 x 2400 resolution.
Xiaomi POCO M4 Pro features a little bit better storage to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy A50, and although they both have equal 128 GB internal memory capacity, the Xiaomi POCO M4 Pro also has a slot for external memory cards that holds a maximum of 1 TB.
The Galaxy A50 counts with a much faster processor than Xiaomi POCO M4 Pro, although it has a lower amount of RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core processing unit. The Xiaomi POCO M4 Pro has better battery life than Samsung Galaxy A50, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity. Samsung Galaxy A50 has a bit better camera than Xiaomi POCO M4 Pro, because although it has a camera with way less megapixels resolution, it also counts with a bigger diafragm aperture to take better low light photos.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.