Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.6 | 79.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 12 | Android 5.1 |
| 2022-03-16 | 2015-08-13 |
| 6.29 x 2.91 x 0.32 inches | 6.03 x 3.00 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.33 ounces | 6.03 ounces |
| -- | Black, Gold, Gray and White |
| -- | Glass; metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 415.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 411 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| 1000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.8 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio G96 MT6781 (12 nm) chipset | Exynos 7 Octa 7420 chipset |
| processor | ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 2100 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC2 GPU | ARM Mali-T760 MP8 GPU |
| 6.12 | 8.46 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDHC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.42 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 2560 x 1440 (60 fps) (Quad HD / 2K) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.8 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| -- | 336 hours standby time 22 hours talk time |
| 6.8 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Note 5 is just a bit better than the Xiaomi POCO M4 Pro, with a 79.3 score against 72.6. Even though the Samsung Galaxy Note 5 is notably older than Xiaomi POCO M4 Pro, it's design is just a little lighter and a bit thinner. Both devices in this comparison have Android OS, but the Samsung Galaxy Note 5 has older 5.1 version and Xiaomi POCO M4 Pro has Android 12.
The Samsung Galaxy Note 5 counts with a much greater hardware performance than Xiaomi POCO M4 Pro, although it has a lower number of cores (although they are faster) and a lower amount of RAM. Samsung Galaxy Note 5 counts with a bit more vivid display than Xiaomi POCO M4 Pro, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a greater display pixels density and a better resolution of 2560 x 1440 pixels.
The Xiaomi POCO M4 Pro counts with a very superior storage capacity to store more games and applications than Galaxy Note 5, because it has a slot for external memory cards that holds a maximum of 1 TB and 128 GB internal storage capacity. The Galaxy Note 5 features just a bit better camera than Xiaomi POCO M4 Pro, although it has a camera with much less mega pixels resolution and a tinier aperture.
Xiaomi POCO M4 Pro features a superior battery life than Samsung Galaxy Note 5, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity against 3000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.